MAKECTBETTER LLC
Connecticut AG sued MAKECTBETTER LLC over an alleged scheme selling fake cannabis retail licenses
Not yet reviewed by our editors. This entry reports what the cited sources say; it may change as we check it. How we check
This entry is about the United States — not the country you picked in the header.
According to Connecticut Office of the Attorney General, Jul 28, 2025 · Read the source
Summary
Connecticut Attorney General William Tong sued MAKECTBETTER LLC, its principal and an affiliate in Hartford Superior Court, announcing it on 28 July 2025. The complaint, filed 3 July, alleges a cannabis license-for-sale scheme that drew payments from as many as 70 businesses.
According to the AG, the defendants told retailers they were part of a fictional state pilot program that could issue exclusive licenses and cannabis supply, backed by documents forged to look like Department of Consumer Protection papers signed by an official in the AG's office. The complaint cites fees of roughly $25,000 to $30,500 per retailer and names three retailers. The AG sought a $2.5 million prejudgment remedy to freeze assets. These are allegations in a civil complaint.
What the source found
- Complaint filed 2025-07-03; AG release 2025-07-28
- Alleged: forged DCP licenses and a fake email account in an official's name; fees about $25,000 to $30,500
- Seeks $2.5 million prejudgment remedy; outcome not reported at retrieval
Products named
- fake cannabis retail licenses
Timeline
Complaint filed in Hartford Superior Court
AG announced suit and asset-freeze application
Sources
- Regulator
Connecticut Office of the Attorney General · Jul 28, 2025
Attorney General Tong Seeks $2.5 Million Prejudgment Remedy in Fraudulent Cannabis License-For-Sale Scheme
Wording on this page follows the sources. Found an error? See the corrections process in our editorial policy.
Status notes
Targets retailers, not shoppers. Defendant individuals are named in the AG release but not reproduced here.
Comments
No comments yet.
Related entries
The full Red ListTell us what happened
Every report is read by a person. You don’t need to prove anything, and we never publish your name.
- A moderator reads your report and checks the link against the Red List and our seller records.
- We look for an authoritative source — a regulator, court, police or consumer-protection finding.
- When a source confirms it, your report is linked to a Red List entry. Your name and contact details stay private.