Intervale Candy CORP
NYC Sheriff summons for a cannabis violation by a place of business, 2 on record
Not yet reviewed by our editors. This entry reports what the cited sources say; it may change as we check it. How we check
This entry is about the United States — not the country you picked in the header.
According to NYC Office of Administrative Trials and Hearings (NYC Open Data), Jun 10, 2025 · Read the source · +1 more
Summary
Intervale Candy CORP, in the Bronx, received 2 summonses from the NYC Sheriff between June 10, 2025 and August 16, 2025; the OATH record titles the charge “cannabis violation by a place of business”.
The infraction amount on each record is $10,000. Hearing outcomes across the 2 summonses: 2 recorded as defaulted. The dataset shows $20,000 in penalties imposed, $0 paid and $20,000 still due as of September 30, 2026.
The dataset records the charge, hearing status and penalty only, not what inspectors found; a summons is a charge. A summons does not by itself mean the premises were padlocked.
What the source found
- Issuing agency: NYC Sheriff; charge title: “cannabis violation by a place of business”.
- 2 summonses; violation dates: June 10, 2025 to August 16, 2025; location: the Bronx.
- Hearing results: defaulted x2; dataset compliance status: Penalty Due.
- Ticket numbers: 0215091975, 0215097630.
Timeline
NYC Sheriff summons 0215091975 issued (docketed)
NYC Sheriff summons 0215097630 issued (docketed)
Sources
- Regulator
NYC Office of Administrative Trials and Hearings (NYC Open Data) · Jun 10, 2025
OATH Hearings Division Case Status, ticket 0215091975 - Regulator
NYC Open Data · Sep 30, 2026
OATH Hearings Division Case Status (dataset)
Wording on this page follows the sources. Found an error? See the corrections process in our editorial policy.
Status notes
[dataset] NYC OATH Hearings Division Case Status (jz4z-kudi), charge "CANNABIS VIOLATION BY A PLACE OF BUSINESS", retrieved 2026-09-30
Comments
No comments yet.
Related entries
The full Red ListTell us what happened
Every report is read by a person. You don’t need to prove anything, and we never publish your name.
- A moderator reads your report and checks the link against the Red List and our seller records.
- We look for an authoritative source — a regulator, court, police or consumer-protection finding.
- When a source confirms it, your report is linked to a Red List entry. Your name and contact details stay private.