Charmar Superette INC
NYC Sheriff summons for a cannabis violation by a place of business
Not yet reviewed by our editors. This entry reports what the cited sources say; it may change as we check it. How we check
This entry is about the United States — not the country you picked in the header.
According to NYC Office of Administrative Trials and Hearings (NYC Open Data), Feb 28, 2025 · Read the source · +1 more
Resolved or closed
The source lists this matter as resolved or closed. The entry stays public so the record remains available.
Summary
Charmar Superette INC was issued 1 summons by the NYC Sheriff on February 28, 2025, each charged as a “cannabis violation by a place of business”, for a location in Staten Is, according to the city's open OATH case records.
The infraction amount on the record is $10,000. Hearing outcome: recorded as in violation. The dataset shows $10,000 in penalties imposed, $10,000 paid and $0 still due as of September 30, 2026. The record's compliance status reads “All Terms Met”.
The dataset records the charge, hearing status and penalty only, not what inspectors found; a summons is a charge. A summons does not by itself mean the premises were padlocked.
What the source found
- Issuing agency: NYC Sheriff; charge title: “cannabis violation by a place of business”.
- 1 summons; violation date: February 28, 2025; location: Staten Is.
- Hearing results: in violation x1; dataset compliance status: All Terms Met.
- Ticket numbers: 0215093488.
Timeline
NYC Sheriff summons 0215093488 issued (paid in full)
Sources
- Regulator
NYC Office of Administrative Trials and Hearings (NYC Open Data) · Feb 28, 2025
OATH Hearings Division Case Status, ticket 0215093488 - Regulator
NYC Open Data · Sep 30, 2026
OATH Hearings Division Case Status (dataset)
Wording on this page follows the sources. Found an error? See the corrections process in our editorial policy.
Status notes
[dataset] NYC OATH Hearings Division Case Status (jz4z-kudi), charge "CANNABIS VIOLATION BY A PLACE OF BUSINESS", retrieved 2026-09-30
Comments
No comments yet.
Related entries
The full Red ListTell us what happened
Every report is read by a person. You don’t need to prove anything, and we never publish your name.
- A moderator reads your report and checks the link against the Red List and our seller records.
- We look for an authoritative source — a regulator, court, police or consumer-protection finding.
- When a source confirms it, your report is linked to a Red List entry. Your name and contact details stay private.